Home Contact Us Links Site Map

Chapter 10 – School Parent Tutor Report/Case Studies


Case Study 4: McCallum's Hill Public School


Introduction:

McCallum's Hill Public School is a culturally diverse school at t the junction of five suburbs: Lakemba, Roselands, Beverly Hills, Belmore and Kingsgrove. Enrolments have remained steady over the last three years. The 2001 enrolment is 479, comprising 244 girls and 235 boys. The students come from 34 different backgrounds providing the school with a vibrance and depth of diversity which enriches the experiences of us all. McCallums's Hill has 70% non English Speaking Background students.

Student mobility remains at between 26 and 27%. The area has high levels of rented accommodation and families in our area tend to save for a home and then relocate.
There are 17 roll classes. The STLD allocation is 3 days per week. Fourteen students with disabilities are integrated into mainstream classes. ESL allocation is two full time and two days part time.

 

Specific Nature of the Program - Starting Point:

The targeted group of low progress readers were the Year 4 students who scored a Band 1 in the BST in 2000. These students in Year 4 were receiving additional support with their literacy needs from the STLD 3 times a week for a total of 3 hours per week. The introduction of "Parents As Tutors" meant that those students were receiving additional individual attention with their literacy learning through an individual program designed by the STLD and based on the students individual literacy needs in reading. The individual program was highly structured and simple to implement by the parent tutor. The program required the student to read sight words, complete related activities to sight words, practice oral reading with a variety of oral reading fluency passages, answer some comprehension questions, write some essential spelling words and read to the tutor a text or book for practice. The program was designed to develop rapport with the tutor and give the student success and the desire to participate with enthusiasm for success.

top

The actual process of gaining parents to participate in the program was very challenging and time consuming. The STLD would walk the playground each afternoon for three weeks and in a casual manner talk to anyone who would listen about the program and then ask them if they were available to help out with the project. The STLD wrote personal letters and rang the parents of the targeted Year 4 students to seek their support in helping their child. Two parents out of 1 0 were willing to help their child. The program would operate 4 times a week for half an hour each session. Each targeted student was to receive an additional half hour individual literacy support four times a week. The challenge was to have enough parents to provide each student with half an hour additional support a day.

 



Step by Step Implementation Procedure - Time tabling Changes:

The structure of school's timetable was altered to make Yr 3-6 reading groups time to be between 9-10am so parents who dropped off their children could start their role as tutors at 9am. Previously, the time allocated for Yr 3-6 reading groups was at 11.20 - 12.20pm making it very difficult to get parents to help as tutors.

Term 2 Yr 3-6 Reading groups started at 9am. The STLD had a targeted group of students who would be the students receiving additional literacy support from the tutors. These students were identified as scoring Band 1 in literacy with BST results.



Unforeseen problems and how they were dealt with:

  1. Limited appropriate resources available to support low progress readers.
    The STLD had a box of twelve high interest low vocabulary books that are always enjoyed by low progress readers. The student's reading levels instructional in the STLD groups ranged from B3 to Extension level. The STLD used the school's guided reading packs to support students at B3, F I and F3 level. However, there was a gap at Extension level and beyond. The school had purchased School Magazines and the STLD had access to the resource. It was very obvious that as the students were making reading achievements that more interesting and motivating readers were needed and essential. The STLD purchased more "Cool Kids" books from Scholastic and lower level lexile books from Scholastic.

  2. In Term 2, 2001 there were six devoted and dedicated Tutors who supported twelve targeted students. Each student was receiving half an hour one to one assistance on an individual reading program each day, four times a week. As Term 2 progressed one of the tutors returned back to work. The five tutors rescheduled their timetable to pick up the two students. The students were receiving daily assistance from the parent tutors.

  3. In Term 3, 2001 another tutor returned back to work. The dilemma was there were four tutors and twelve students. The tutors redesigned the timetable so STLD redesigned the individual programs to take 15 minutes each. Now all the students received individual attention, four times weekly.

top

 

What impact did the project have on student outcomes:

Attitudinal:
  1. The targeted students all stated in their reading survey in November 2001 that they enjoyed reading a lot. The students stated that they liked reading to a parent tutor a lot. Ten out of twelve students enjoyed reading at home a lot. Eleven out of twelve students borrowing from the library improved by 40% since Term 1, 2001. Eight out twelve students surveyed felt that they were able to read very well. In April 2001 twelve students stated that they felt they were okay readers. Four out of twelve students felt that they were able to read well. Pleasing, all the targeted students stated that they were more confident readers since the beginning of the year. 100% of the students stated that they preferred to read a variety of books, magazines and comics.



Academic Outcomes - Star Supplementary Test of Achievement in Reading.

top

Academic Outcomes Instructional Reading Level Using PM Benchmark Kit:

 



Suggestions for how you would do it differently if you were doing it again:

- Shorten Parent Tutor blocks. Parents actual work with students;
- 6 week block as to 8 week block per term. (Commitment time for parents);
- Broaden students targeted. Continued support to be given to existing Year 4 students, once a week at least;
- Regularly retrain parents every term.

 

Conclusions regarding reading project that might he useful to others:

Parent involvement with student learning has been a positive link within the community. Empowering parents with tutoring basic literacy skills will have a long term positive outcome for themselves and their understanding of how students learn.
The fine tuning of physical and human resources to maximise student learning outcomes. Identifying students with literacy needs and giving them additional needs and giving them additional one to one assistance has definitely resulted in improved student learning outcomes.

top

 

Recommendations regarding reading project that might he useful to other schools:

Allocate sufficient funds to purchase appropriate resources to enable the program to be successful. Time tabling to support a target group, or group(s) within literacy block.
Ongoing collection of baseline date throughout each term in order to state achieved outcomes.

 

Brief description of assessment strategies:

  1. Child's Reading Survey - to measure change in student attitude towards reading. Completed by student themselves
  2. Teacher Survey - to measure change in teacher attitude and reflect upon classroom practice with reading.
  3. Teacher Evaluation Form for children on individual programs to measure change in student's attitude towards learning
  4. STAR supplementary Test of Achievement in Reading Years 4 - 6. (Warwick B. Elley). There are four sub-tests of the STAR Reading Test. There are two tests available. Quick and easy to administer and mark.
  5. PM Readers Benchmark Kit. Text and marking sheet is provided. Taking

 

Approximate cost of funding materials used in your project:

1.
Rainbow readers
$600
2.
Tape recorder
$100
3.
Photocopying of resources for individual programs
$80
4.
Folder and dividers
$60
5.
Thank you Morning Teas, 1 per term x4
$80
6.
High interest, low vocabulary books (Captain Underpants, Cool Kids) Scholastic.
$400
   

 

Spin off from the project:

- The
library is to start to introduce Lexiles in Year 3 and 4 as part of the Home Reading Scheme.

- Changed attitude towards withdrawing a targeted group of students who showed an obvious increase in reading skills that could be measured.
   
 
Copyright © Commonwealth of Australia 2002. All Rights Reserved ®